First prove: (1)=>(2)
- A tree is connected (and acyclic) and assume it has more than 1 vertex (2nd statement is vacuous truth if not)
- A connected graph implies any 2 vertices are connected by a path
- Assume there are 2 distinct paths between 2 vertices, which means there is a cycle and it’s a contradiction
Then prove: (2)=>(1)
- Suppose any 2 vertices are joined by a unique path in a graph T
- T is connected
- Unique path ⟹ no cycles
- T is a tree
Then prove: (1)=>(3)
- Suppose any 2 vertices are joined by a unique path in a graph T
- T is connected
- Unique path ⟹ no cycles
- Using induction on vertex count, prove ∣E(T)∣=∣V(T)∣−1
Then prove: (3)=>(4)
- Assume the condition and T is cyclic.
- There exists a cycle of length k edges and k vertices
- Case 1
k=∣V(T)∣
- ⟹∣E(T)∣≥∣V(T)∣
- Contradiction
- Case 2
k<∣V(T)∣
- ∣V(T)∣−k vertices are outside the cycle
- They each require an edge to be connected to the graph (∣V(T)∣−k additional edges)
- Total number of edges becomes ∣V(T)∣
- Contradiction
Then prove: (4)=>(1)
- Assume the condition and T is not connected.
- Acyclic and not connected means it’s a forest which is a composition of trees (say m).
- ∣E(T)∣=∣V(T)∣−1 is given which means m=1 which means T is connected (contradiction and proven)